Celia Cervino Ruiz vs Tian Jialin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W L L
Form
W L W L W W L W L LHead-2-Head: Ruiz 1 - 0 Jialin
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruiz winning 2 and Jialin winning 1. The last match between Ruiz and Jialin was at the W15 Alcala de Henares, 24-11-2024, Final, Hard with Celia Cervino Ruiz getting the victory 2-6 7-6(0) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celia Cervino Ruiz | 1 |
| Tian Jialin | 0 |
W15 Alcala de Henares(24-11-2024)
2
6
7
6
6
4
| Ruiz | Stats | Jialin |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (13-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (7-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 561 | Ranking | N/A |
| 504 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 18 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (159-117) | Career Total W/L | 64% (50-28) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 7-6(0) 6-4 |
Stats 
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Tian Jialin
71%
(
70 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:23:0 | Average Match Time | 2:23:0 |
| 71% (70/99) | 1st Serve % | 56% (48/85) |
| 56% (39/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (30/48) |
| 55% (16/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 70% (7/10) |
| 46% (39/85) | Return Points Win % | 44% (44/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celia Cervino Ruiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
61%
(
76 of
125)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
117
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Emily Appleton
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
77%
(
10 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatiana Pieri
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Samira De Stefano
Player
Celia Cervino Ruiz
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celia Cervino Ruiz
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
44%
(
17 of
39)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
16 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tian Jialin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Tian Jialin
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
0
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
1
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Unknown Player
Player
Tian Jialin
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tian Jialin
Player
Xichen Zhao
51%
(
50 of
98)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stusek
Player
Tian Jialin
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
44 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tian Jialin
Player
Dominika Podhajecka
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 5-7 6-1 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Tian Jialin
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (159/117) | Win/Loss | 64% (50/28) |
| 57% (355/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 63% (106/63) |
| 53% (3034/2684) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (863/652) |
| 58% (78/56) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (44/22) |
| 55% (34/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) |
| 59% (47/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 34 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1184 | Total Double Faults | 81 |
| 1:14:9 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 438.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 112.54 |
| 64% (8374/13139) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1665/2605) |
| 61% (5114/8374) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (930/1665) |
| 39% (1862/4782) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (462/940) |
| 49% (887/1818) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (161/324) |
| 48% (6352/13369) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1137/2390) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (59/65) | Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 66% (100/52) | Futures W/L | 67% (48/24) |
| 58% (156/271) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (48/76) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (22/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 51% (41/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 85% (160/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (52/48) |
| 15% (160/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (52/4) |
| 20% (115/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
